Understanding Project Success: Perspectives from Different Stakeholder Groups
Understanding and aligning different stakeholder perspectives is crucial for achieving project success. This study explores how varying interpretations of project success criteria among senior management, project teams, and recipients can lead to project failure. A multiple stakeholder model is proposed to enhance collaboration and reduce the risk of unsuccessful outcomes.
Project management is a critical operational tool that organizations use to handle customized, one-off events across various functions. The effectiveness of project management lies in its ability to manage resources, tasks, activities, and associated timelines. However, project success is not uniformly defined, which has led to a high rate of perceived project failures. A study published in the International Journal of Project Management highlights that project failure often results from differing interpretations of success criteria among multiple stakeholder groups. This article aims to delve into these perceptions, examining how aligning stakeholder views can minimize project failure and enhance successful project outcomes.
Background on Project Success and Stakeholder Perspectives
Historically, project success has been measured using various instruments and methods, with Pinto and Slevin’s (1987) ‘diagnostic behavioral instrument’ being one of the most cited tools. However, this tool and others like it primarily focus on the project manager’s perspective, often neglecting the views of other key stakeholders such as senior management, the project core team, and project recipients. This oversight can lead to a misalignment in expectations and outcomes, contributing to the perception of project failure.
The Importance of Stakeholder Alignment in Project Success
The failure of projects is a common concern in project management. For instance, the Standish Group (2012) found that 18% of projects fail outright, while 43% are challenged. KPMG (2013) reported similar findings, noting that only 33% of projects were completed on budget, 29% on time, and 35% to scope. These statistics highlight the need for a more inclusive approach to defining project success—one that incorporates the perspectives of all relevant stakeholder groups. By understanding and aligning the different views on what constitutes project success, organizations can reduce the likelihood of project failure.
Key Findings from the Study
1. Diverse Stakeholder Perceptions
The study identified communication as a common theme across five stakeholder groups (project manager, client, owner, user, and project team). However, the emphasis on other success dimensions varied among these groups. For example, project managers and users valued time, cost, and stakeholder satisfaction, while senior management focused on strategic benefits and top management support.
2. Lack of Common Success Dimensions
The absence of shared success dimensions among certain stakeholder groups, particularly between senior management and project recipients, was a significant finding. This lack of commonality suggests that different stakeholders may prioritize different project outcomes, leading to misaligned expectations and perceptions of success.
3. Impact of Project Phases on Success Perceptions
Stakeholders’ perceptions of success change throughout the project lifecycle. Clients, for instance, become more aware of their needs as the project progresses, which can result in conflicting requirements between them and project sponsors who set the initial project scope.
4. New Dimensions for Measuring Success
The study proposed new dimensions to measure project success, taking into account benefits to the stakeholder group, client/customer-specific issues, and the traditional metrics of time, cost, and quality.
%
Project Completion
According to the Standish Group’s 2012 CHAOS Report, only 39% of projects are considered successful, 43% challenged, 18% failing. Source: Standish Group, 2012 CHAOS Report
%
Project Completion
A McKinsey & Company report found that large IT projects run 45% over budget and 7% over time, while delivering 56% less value than predicted. Source: McKinsey & Company, 2012
The Role of Senior Management and Project Teams
The study emphasized the critical role of senior management in defining and supporting project success. Senior management’s involvement is crucial in setting realistic goals, allocating resources, and providing top management support. Similarly, the project core team’s engagement ensures that the project is executed effectively, with attention to detail and a focus on meeting project objectives.
Developing a Multiple Stakeholder Model
A key outcome of the study was the proposal of a multiple stakeholder model that considers the diverse views of different stakeholder groups. This model aims to enhance the dynamic engagement of stakeholders, allowing for continuous collaboration, capturing changing priorities, and facilitating effective communication. By doing so, organizations can ensure that project success criteria are aligned with the expectations of all stakeholders, leading to more successful project outcomes.
Conclusion
Future Research Directions
Future research should continue to explore the perceptions of project success across a broader range of industries and project types. Additionally, empirical studies should be conducted to validate the proposed multiple stakeholder model and to refine the success dimensions identified. By doing so, project management as a discipline can develop more inclusive and effective strategies for managing complex projects, ultimately leading to higher rates of success and satisfaction among all stakeholders.
Conclusion
The study’s findings underline the need for a more holistic approach to project management—one that incorporates the perspectives of all relevant stakeholders. By understanding and addressing the different success dimensions valued by various stakeholder groups, organizations can minimize project failure rates and achieve more consistent project success. This approach not only aligns project outcomes with stakeholder expectations but also fosters a more collaborative and motivated project environment.
References
- Davis, K. (2017). An empirical investigation into different stakeholder groups’ perception of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(5), 604-617.
- Standish Group. (2012). Chaos Report. Standish Group International.
- KPMG. (2013). Project Management Survey Report. KPMG, New Zealand.
- Pinto, J.K., & Slevin, D.P. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-34(1), 22-27.
Wanna know more? Let's dive in!
ISO 9001 Checklist: A Step-by-Step Guide to Implementation
[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="ISO 9001 Checklist: A Step-by-Step Guide to Implementation" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px" filter_hue_rotate="100deg"...
Read this before you read ISO 9001
[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="The 7 principles of quality management" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px" filter_hue_rotate="100deg" hover_enabled="0"...
When AI Met ISO 9001
[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="When AI Met ISO 9001" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px" filter_hue_rotate="100deg"...
Sustainability Through Collaboration Building a Greener Future Together
[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="Sustainability Through Collaboration: Driving Change Across Industries" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px"...
Why Sustainable Car Design Matters
[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="A Comprehensive Exploration of Agile Auditing" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px" filter_hue_rotate="100deg"...
Cultivating a Quality Culture: Guide to Organizational Excellence
In today’s rapidly evolving global marketplace, organizations across various sectors are recognizing the critical importance of fostering a culture centered on quality. This emphasis is not merely about adhering to standards or regulations but involves embedding quality into the very fabric of an organization’s ethos, operations, and interactions. A robust quality culture ensures that every member, from top leadership to frontline employees, is committed to continuous improvement, customer satisfaction, and operational excellence.
The Hidden Costs of Human Error in Healthcare
Human error is a significant challenge in healthcare, where even minor mistakes can have serious consequences. Unlike other industries, errors in healthcare directly affect human lives, making patient safety a top priority. The increasing complexity of modern healthcare, with its integration of technology and electronic health records, introduces both opportunities and challenges. The need for quality assurance is paramount in reducing human errors and ensuring high standards of patient care.
Consistency in Quality: The Foundation of Total Quality Management
In today’s fast-paced and competitive business landscape, ensuring quality is paramount for survival and success. Concepts such as Total Quality Management (TQM), Lean Manufacturing, and Time-Based Competition have gained prominence as organizations strive to enhance efficiency, reduce waste, and improve customer satisfaction. However, one of the most overlooked yet critical factors for the successful implementation of these quality programs is consistency in quality. Without consistency, even the most well-planned quality strategies may fail to yield the desired results.
Software Engineering Process and Quality Assurance Framework
The automotive industry is experiencing rapid transformation, driven by advances in technology, increasing competition, and evolving customer expectations. To stay ahead in this dynamic landscape, companies must continuously innovate while optimizing costs. One of the most effective strategies for achieving these objectives is outsourcing software development and engineering processes.
Elevating Software Quality in Automotive Engineering
In the ever-evolving landscape of automotive engineering, ensuring high software quality is a key challenge. With the increasing complexity of vehicle functionalities and the integration of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), maintaining stringent quality standards is essential. Volkswagen introduced the Software Quality Improvement Leader (SQIL) initiative to bridge the gap between software quality and supplier collaboration, ensuring the highest standards in automotive software development.
The Future of Batteries: How Organic Batteries Are Changing the Game
Organic batteries are on the rise, offering safer, greener, and cheaper alternatives to traditional batteries. As research progresses, we can expect longer-lasting, flexible, and biodegradable batteries powering our future devices.
Organic Thermoelectrics: Turning Heat into Power
Imagine if you could charge your phone just by wearing your hoodie, or if your laptop could recycle its own heat to power itself. Sounds futuristic, right? Well, organic thermoelectrics are making this a reality! This cool (or should we say hot?) technology is all about using special materials to turn wasted heat into usable electricity.