[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="When AI Met ISO 9001" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px" filter_hue_rotate="100deg"...
Innovation is no longer optional — it’s a necessity for long-term success. But managing innovation systematically is a complex task. That’s where innovation frameworks come in. From design thinking and agile to structured systems like ISO 56001, organizations have several options. But which framework is the best fit for your needs?
ISO 56001 is an upcoming international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an Innovation Management System (IMS) within organizations. Part of the ISO 56000 series, ISO 56001 is designed to help organizations build a structured, repeatable, and scalable approach to innovation, aligning innovation activities with business strategy and long-term value creation.
Expected to be published in the near future, ISO 56001 follows the same high-level structure as other ISO management system standards like ISO 9001 (Quality Management) and ISO 14001 (Environmental Management). This makes it easier for organizations to integrate innovation management with existing systems and processes.
The standard is built on several core principles:
ISO 56001 is not a one-size-fits-all solution — it is designed to be flexible and applicable to organizations of all sizes and sectors. It does not prescribe specific innovation tools or methods (e.g., design thinking, agile), but rather provides a framework that organizations can tailor to their needs.
By adopting ISO 56001, organizations can move beyond ad-hoc innovation efforts and create a systematic, measurable, and sustainable innovation capability. It enables better decision-making, improved risk management, and enhanced performance — making innovation a core driver of growth and resilience.
In short, ISO 56001 provides the structure and discipline needed to make innovation a true competitive advantage.
Why: You need clear boundaries and goals to keep the pilot focused and manageable.
Actions:
Why: Executive support is essential for resource allocation, visibility, and long-term success.
Actions:
Why: This helps you understand where you are now versus where ISO 56001 recommends you should be.
Actions:
Why: You need to tailor ISO 56001’s elements to your context.
Actions:
Why: People make or break a system. Training drives awareness, adoption, and alignment.
Actions:
Why: This is where the system is tested in real conditions.
Actions:
Why: The pilot’s true value comes from what you learn — and how you apply it.
Actions:
Why: A successful pilot sets the foundation for organization-wide adoption.
Actions:
Let’s break it down by comparing ISO 56001 to other common innovation methodologies:
Focus: Human-centered design, empathy, prototyping
Best for: Early-stage idea development, product and service design
Strengths:
Limitations:
ISO 56001 vs. Design Thinking:
ISO 56001 provides a holistic framework, while design thinking is a toolset that can be embedded within it. For organizations that need a repeatable innovation system, ISO 56001 is the more comprehensive choice.
READ MORE ABOUT DESIGN THINKING
Focus: Iterative development, speed, collaboration
Best for: Software and tech-focused environments
Strengths:
Limitations:
ISO 56001 vs. Agile Innovation:
ISO 56001 promotes a strategic and scalable innovation approach. Agile can operate within an ISO 56001 system, particularly in development stages. ISO 56001 ensures innovation aligns with long-term business goals.
READ MORE ABOUT AGILE INNOVATION
Focus: Risk management through phased decision-making
Best for: Large-scale R&D, product development
Strengths:
Limitations:
ISO 56001 vs. Stage-Gate:
While the stage-gate process emphasizes control, ISO 56001 balances structure with adaptability. It supports both exploratory and exploitative innovation, making it a broader framework.
READ MORE ABOUT STAGE-GATE PROCESS
Focus: Build-measure-learn cycles, market validation
Best for: Startups and intrapreneurship
Strengths:
Limitations:
ISO 56001 vs. Lean Startup:
Lean Startup excels at validating new business models, but ISO 56001 supports end-to-end innovation management, including portfolio management, governance, and culture change.
Design Thinking is a human-centered approach to problem-solving that emphasizes empathy, creativity, and iterative learning. Originally rooted in the work of designers and architects, it has evolved into a powerful methodology used across industries to develop innovative products, services, systems, and strategies. The essence of Design Thinking is to understand users deeply, challenge assumptions, redefine problems, and create solutions that are not only innovative but also meaningful and practical.
Design Thinking revolves around a few key principles:
While there are different versions of the framework, the most widely used model was popularized by the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford (the d.school), consisting of five phases:
Design Thinking helps break down complex challenges and reframe them in a way that is actionable and human-centered. It fosters creativity and innovation, encourages cross-functional collaboration, and focuses on real user needs. Because it emphasizes understanding problems before jumping to solutions, it often leads to more effective, sustainable outcomes.
In business, Design Thinking has been embraced by companies like Apple, Google, IBM, and IDEO. It’s used not just for product development but also for reimagining customer experiences, redesigning processes, and creating new business models.
Design Thinking is not just a process; it’s a mindset — a way of thinking that puts people at the center. It challenges organizations to step outside their assumptions, work collaboratively, and experiment fearlessly. Whether you’re designing a new app or rethinking a social system, Design Thinking helps ensure your solutions are not only innovative but also desirable, feasible, and viable.
Agile Innovation is the application of agile principles to the process of innovation — combining speed, flexibility, and customer focus to create and deliver new ideas, products, or services quickly and iteratively. It’s a dynamic approach that helps organizations respond to rapid changes in the market, emerging technologies, and evolving customer needs.
Rooted in the Agile methodology popularized by software development, Agile Innovation emphasizes collaboration, short development cycles (sprints), ongoing user feedback, and the ability to pivot quickly. Instead of long planning and execution phases, Agile Innovation promotes constant experimentation and iteration, making it particularly well-suited to today’s fast-paced, uncertain business environment.
Agile Innovation is built around several core principles:
While different organizations may adapt Agile in various ways, the general flow involves:
Agile Innovation is ideal in environments where speed, adaptability, and customer feedback are critical. It works especially well for:
Agile Innovation is more than a buzzword — it’s a proven, practical approach to navigating complexity and uncertainty in innovation. By combining structure with flexibility, and creativity with discipline, Agile Innovation helps organizations stay relevant, responsive, and ahead of the curve.
The Stage-Gate Process, also known as the Phase-Gate Process, is a structured innovation and project management approach used to guide new product development (NPD) from idea to launch. Developed by Dr. Robert G. Cooper, this methodology divides innovation projects into distinct stages (where work is done) and gates (where decisions are made). Each stage is designed to gather information and reduce uncertainty, while each gate serves as a checkpoint to assess progress and decide whether to proceed, pause, or stop the project.
The Stage-Gate Process helps organizations manage risk, allocate resources efficiently, and improve the success rate of innovation initiatives — particularly for complex, high-investment projects.
The model is typically structured as follows:
Each stage involves specific activities, deliverables, and objectives. Common stages include:
At the end of each stage is a gate where a cross-functional leadership team evaluates the project’s progress using pre-defined criteria such as:
A decision is made to Go, Kill, Hold, or Recycle the project.
The Stage-Gate model is especially useful for:
While highly effective for managing risk, the Stage-Gate Process has been criticized for being too rigid or bureaucratic in fast-moving environments. In response, many companies now use Agile-Stage-Gate hybrids, combining the discipline of stage-gate with the flexibility and speed of agile sprints. This modernized approach allows for faster iteration, continuous customer feedback, and greater adaptability — especially in digital or software-driven innovation projects.
The Stage-Gate Process provides a proven, disciplined framework for navigating complex innovation projects from concept to launch. While not as flexible as agile methods, its structured checkpoints and clear deliverables make it ideal for organizations that need control, coordination, and confidence in their innovation investments.
The Lean Startup is a business development methodology that focuses on building products or services through validated learning, rapid experimentation, and iterative releases. Developed by entrepreneur Eric Ries and popularized in his 2011 book “The Lean Startup”, the approach is designed to help startups — and even large organizations — create sustainable businesses by learning what customers really want before investing heavily in full product development.
Instead of following a traditional “build it and they will come” model, the Lean Startup emphasizes building only what is necessary to test key assumptions, gathering customer feedback early, and using that feedback to adapt the product or strategy quickly.
Though originally developed for tech startups, the Lean Startup method has been adopted by:
Large organizations like GE, Intuit, and the U.S. government have implemented Lean Startup principles to drive internal innovation and make their processes more agile.
The Lean Startup method offers a powerful, flexible approach to innovation. By focusing on learning over planning, and adaptability over prediction, it helps entrepreneurs and organizations build products that people actually want — faster, cheaper, and with greater success.
ISO 56001 isn’t a replacement for popular innovation tools — it’s a framework to unify and systematize them. If your organization wants to move beyond ad-hoc innovation efforts and embed innovation into your culture and strategy, ISO 56001 offers a robust, scalable solution.
That said, tools like Design Thinking, Agile, or Lean Startup can complement ISO 56001, especially in tactical phases. The real magic happens when these tools operate within a cohesive innovation management system.
Need help choosing or implementing the right innovation framework? Let’s chat. The right system can turn ideas into impact — consistently.
[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="When AI Met ISO 9001" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px" filter_hue_rotate="100deg"...
[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="Sustainability Through Collaboration: Driving Change Across Industries" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px"...
[dsm_gradient_text gradient_text="A Comprehensive Exploration of Agile Auditing" _builder_version="4.27.0" _module_preset="default" header_font="Questrial|||on|||||" header_text_align="center" header_letter_spacing="5px" filter_hue_rotate="100deg"...
In today’s rapidly evolving global marketplace, organizations across various sectors are recognizing the critical importance of fostering a culture centered on quality. This emphasis is not merely about adhering to standards or regulations but involves embedding quality into the very fabric of an organization’s ethos, operations, and interactions. A robust quality culture ensures that every member, from top leadership to frontline employees, is committed to continuous improvement, customer satisfaction, and operational excellence.
Human error is a significant challenge in healthcare, where even minor mistakes can have serious consequences. Unlike other industries, errors in healthcare directly affect human lives, making patient safety a top priority. The increasing complexity of modern healthcare, with its integration of technology and electronic health records, introduces both opportunities and challenges. The need for quality assurance is paramount in reducing human errors and ensuring high standards of patient care.
In today’s fast-paced and competitive business landscape, ensuring quality is paramount for survival and success. Concepts such as Total Quality Management (TQM), Lean Manufacturing, and Time-Based Competition have gained prominence as organizations strive to enhance efficiency, reduce waste, and improve customer satisfaction. However, one of the most overlooked yet critical factors for the successful implementation of these quality programs is consistency in quality. Without consistency, even the most well-planned quality strategies may fail to yield the desired results.
The automotive industry is experiencing rapid transformation, driven by advances in technology, increasing competition, and evolving customer expectations. To stay ahead in this dynamic landscape, companies must continuously innovate while optimizing costs. One of the most effective strategies for achieving these objectives is outsourcing software development and engineering processes.
In the ever-evolving landscape of automotive engineering, ensuring high software quality is a key challenge. With the increasing complexity of vehicle functionalities and the integration of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), maintaining stringent quality standards is essential. Volkswagen introduced the Software Quality Improvement Leader (SQIL) initiative to bridge the gap between software quality and supplier collaboration, ensuring the highest standards in automotive software development.
Organic batteries are on the rise, offering safer, greener, and cheaper alternatives to traditional batteries. As research progresses, we can expect longer-lasting, flexible, and biodegradable batteries powering our future devices.
Imagine if you could charge your phone just by wearing your hoodie, or if your laptop could recycle its own heat to power itself. Sounds futuristic, right? Well, organic thermoelectrics are making this a reality! This cool (or should we say hot?) technology is all about using special materials to turn wasted heat into usable electricity.
In the rapidly evolving field of display technology, ensuring impeccable screen quality is paramount. Mura defects, characterized by irregular brightness or color variations, pose significant challenges in OLED display manufacturing. Traditional inspection methods often fall short in detecting these subtle imperfections. This comprehensive blog post delves into the innovative application of region-based machine learning techniques for effective Mura defect detection. By exploring the integration of advanced algorithms, dataset generation, and adversarial training, we highlight a robust approach that achieves superior accuracy and efficiency in identifying and classifying Mura defects.
Industry 4.0 is transforming manufacturing and business operations by integrating digital technologies to drive sustainable innovation. This article explores the role of Industry 4.0 in fostering eco-friendly practices, enhancing efficiency, and optimizing resource utilization. A structured roadmap outlines how businesses can leverage Industry 4.0 for long-term sustainability and competitive advantage.